Wednesday, 28 September 2016


Our supporters have been out and about in the Forest of Dean this month hoping to catch a glimpse of the boar.  Reports are that it is still very difficult to see any due to the tall bracken.

Having said this, we have had a few incidents reported already about boar getting too close for comfort.

One such nature lover contacted us about a standoff between himself, his dog and five boar near Brierley.  Concerned for others in such a situation, he (Scott Worgan) contacted the local press who wrote of his experience here.  The report was exagerrated of course, to make a better story, and sadly Scott was criticised in the next edition by boar lovers, including (alarmingly) someone claiming to be from Friends of the Boar!

We would like to make it clear that Friends of the Boar did not respond to the press report at all, and it concerns us that some people may be using our name in vain.

This cat-fighting in the pages of the local letters section of the press does nobody any good.  It only entrenches people's belief towards the boar, good or bad.  Yet what we are discovering is an increasing tolerance for the boar even in situations like Scott's, including residents who have contacted us about boar outside their homes.

We now believe that the hatred coming out of both camps (boar lovers versus boar haters) is actually being initiated and catalysed according to how we perceive each other (in the press usually) as human beings.

It is becoming clearer that boar haters are actually hating the people who support the boar more than they hate the boar themselves. And visa versa.

This is a classic divide and rule strategy employed by the authorities who are happy to read about the "war of words"  at the same time as getting on with their agendas without any democratic accountability.

A bigger picture begins to emerge, one where our countryside, our forest, our towns, and indeed our own individual health is at stake.

More and more studies are coming to the conclusion that we NEED nature, and that nature needs to be working properly.  Human beings have evolved in sync with nature and it's cycles of boom and bust via drought and flood, warming and cooling, freezing and melting.

But as we are more and more aware, things are changing rapidly towards a disequilibrium.  Whether this is because of human activity (as per the climate change idea) or via natural variability it does not matter.

Einstein famously stated that a problem cannot be solved with the same "mind" that created it.  We, therefore, cannot solve any crisis, be it climate or animal in nature if it is us that created it in the first place.

But rather than just sit back and watch the "war on words" unfold, now believing that our destiny is pre-ordained, we must change the "mind" of ourselves and those around us.

Not only that, but we must also understand that we have an inner ecosystem at work within every individual.  It is becoming more obvious that this inner world is becoming just as out of equilibrium as the outer world.  A doctor would term this as a "disbiosis".

Intensive farming, antibiotics, vaccinations, growth hormones, fertilisers (rich in nitrogen and phosporous), soil degredation, food additives, sweeteners, bulking agents, and the quest to make a quick buck has led us inexorably to ill-health through the food we eat.

All the above are linked to allergies, gut problems, fatigue problems, cancer, neurologic problems, autism,  heart disease, the list is long.

This terrible affliction starts in the gut when our microbes are killed off or starved of their nutritious power source.  We are dependent on the balance of these microbes in our gut for we are 90% microbe (only 1 in 10 of the cells in our body are human).

To restore our physical health requires nature to do what it does best, and what we have evolved with.  We need a restorative ecology that provides us with nutritious food that feeds our inner ecosystem.  Once this suceeds, we will learn very easily that the microbial world of ours has a direct influence on our wellbeing (sense of security) and importantly on the way we think (the mind).

Conservation is a tool that requires a fresh mind.  This fresh and healthy mind can cure what we humans have harmed, both in respect of our food production, our climate and our relationship to the wild.

A forest is a very special place unlike most other external ecosystems.  It has defined boundaries we can perceive.  It contains trees that give us clean air and convert carbon dioxide into oxygen.  The trees need the microbes in the soil to do their work, and the microbes need larger animals to manage them in turn.

One such architect of a healthy forest is the wild boar.

A wild boar is thus a symbol of a healthy you!

Repsect and cherish our healing forest.

Forgive those who do not think like you.

Reap the reward of less anger and feelings of insecurity, and reap the benefit of love and acceptance.

We hope that one day we will change the mind that created all the problems, for only then will we move on to better things.

David J Slater

Monday, 12 September 2016


An ITV 1 documentary will be aired tomorrow (Tuesday 13th September) at 8pm.

It's title is Nightmare Neighbours.  It is part of a series and it will attempt to portray the wild boar as just that - a nightmare neighbour for residents here in the Forest of Dean.

Anyone who read the last post and maybe thought we were exagerating about the mainstream media, may like to read The Daily Mail just 2 days ago (9th September 2016).  The article is clearly  presstituting itself to the ITV Corporation by advertising the ITV programme tomorrow in such a sensationalist and downright inaccurate way.

This, apparently, is what the mainstream thinks we want to see and hear and what sells viewing figures!  Treating the British public like brainless idiots will surely backfire?

Read the fully biased and derogatory article towards people of the Forest of Dean  here

 Friends of the Boar were interviewed for the programme, and we can only hope that they haven't distorted our voice.

We will be looking carefully to see if they showed how people can help to repair the turves of grass dug by boar.  We hope they will show the wildflowers created by diggings.  We certainly hope our message about the current over-cull is causing more problems than it solves will also be given some airtime.  And we would also expect our strategy for controlling numbers more effectively, and with a social and ecological conscience, will also be aired.

Let us see...

Monday, 5 September 2016


The last week of August witnessed the seasonal appearance of the boar after the summer recess.  Hooray!

Boar fans may wish to visit the Forest of Dean now with a hope a seeing one of our most amazing mammals.

Every year, almost to the day, boar reappear from the heart of the forest. After a safe period of piglet rearing, the shortage of food starts to bite and the roadside verges start to call.

This is also a time when the inexperienced, first-time mums, give birth to their first litter of 4-6 piglets.  The roadside verges represent a life-saving resource to these families, stocked full of insect grubs not to mention human waste after a summer full of litter throwing tourists.
Grubs as well as flowers grow well in the warmth of these verges, comparatively unshaded from the sun unlike the deeper parts of the forest where a dense tree canopy has all but killed of the grass by blocking out the light.

This period of fresh diggings around the forest always sparks a media frenzy for silly stories, and this year is no different.

The media are gifted press releases from the Forestry Commission's new public relations department of spin and disinformation.  But not before meetings are convened in secret with various stakeholders in the Forest.  It has become clear that the Forest of Dean is becoming corporatist by the backdoor, rather than by direct sell-off by the quango's (the FC) master in government (DEFRA).

On the 24th August, one such meeting took place between the Forestry Commission, commercial pig-breeders, boar hunters (The Deer Initiative) and the NFU (National farmers Union).  Also present was the UKplc's local representative Mark Harper MP.

A day later, as predicted by Friends of the Boar, the results of the meeting would hit the centralised mainstream news media, leading to the usual inaccurate and utterly sensationalised descriptions of what is actually happening in the Forest of Dean.

The BBC had pig farmers on it's radio broadcasts, whining about breeding purity of rare breeds coming under attack.  One woman mentioned being unable to allow her pigs roam wild on a grass bank because of threats from wild boar mating with her prized meat on trotters.

Thankfully on this show, Scott Passmore, formerly of Friends of the Boar but these days running his own venture "A Wild Life With Animals", challenged this pig-breeder to get a more secure fence around her pigs, just like her predecessors would have had when the Forest of Dean allowed pigs to roam free for months during pannage.  Pig breeders didn't seem concerned with interbreeding of pigs of all shapes and races back then!

The only discussion that is noted in the main press release (see link) is how to kill more and more boar in the light of new and scientifically ridiculous guesswork on boar numbers.  Numbers that are now put at over 1,500 boar, or in excess of 21 wild boar for every square kilometre of forest habitat!!

Utterly impossible!

This is dumbed down for the volunteer journalism recruits, or novice but enthusiastic corporate-sponsored "Presstitutes".  A syndicated and automated news story feed with a tag-line that the boar population has increased by 50% on last year lands on their desk and they feel they need to generate click-throughs in order to be noticed by their editor.

The National Pig Association (NPA) of course believes everything that it's told by the inventors of the boar census at Bank House in Coleford, Gloucestershire.  Similarly, the UKplc's rep also unquestionably defers to that authority, and what is created is a "consensus" without facts.  Everyone is now awakening to the consensus trick of the mainstream media, but it doesn't stop themselves making each other look foolish and stupid.

Have a read of the ludicrous take from The Sun newspaper (see link), who also attempts to make us fearful of "educated" hogs, "smashing" through fences, leaving councillors "baffled".

None of this is actually happening!

Here is the NPA's own knee jerk report (see link) to the inaccurate news on boar numbers. The NPA now "demands" numbers be drastically reduced before the profits of UKplc take a turn for the worse.

The pig industry is of course controlled by DEFRA (the same daddy to the FC) through licenses and regulations, so it comes as no surprise the NPA has no voice of its own as clearly demonstrated in their report. The NPA quotes "new modelling" of numbers without question!  The conclusion of this is the targeting of over 700 wild boar for this next hunting season (of course a number that doesn't exist naturally without the intervention of bad management).

Is it a coincidence that this news also comes the same week that guns are being fired at our badgers too?

This place is THE FOREST of DEATH.   Bad science, consensus and a whore of a corporate mainstream press are forcing this upon us and our wildlife.  It has no basis in fact and hides the true reasons behind diseases in animals - it is bad domestic husbandry.

The NPA claim they're worried about boar giving pigs diseases, when it is exactly the opposite that is true - domestic pigs are the historical and present-day source of all swine disease.  We worry that diseased pigs on farms meet with the boar.  We urge the farmers to fence in their diseased animals!

The pig industry admits that it is domestic pigs that pose the greatest biosecurity threat to other pigs and give advice on this here.

The same argument is true for Tb in cattle.  Poor cattle husbandry has been shown to be the vector for Tb in badgers.  But DEFRA and the "CON-sensus" CON-struct tries to avert gaze away from the truths about British farming and its disastrous effects on wildlife.

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

The Boar on Terror

 The Forest of Dean is most famous for its ancient woodlands. It has the largest amount of oak trees in the United Kingdom. Previously the forest was only reserved for royal hunting, and that is how it gained its name as the Royal Forest of Dean. 

The Forest of Dean used to have an incredible mining industry, one of the largest in Britain. It still has ancient rights that preserve miners to dwell anywhere in the forest, as long as they are over 21 and have spent a year and a day down a mine. 

With the abundance of natural beauty that the Forest of Dean beholds it has many tourist attractions to entice new visitors to the area. Symonds Yat is a small, scenic village located at the bottom of the valley, and its rich with wildlife. A canoe can be hired to meander along the river Wye, with possibilities of spotting a rare peregrine falcon. The award winning sculpture trail is the largest in South Wales and England, a walking magazine rated it, ‘one of the best walks in the area’. Puzzle Wood is located near Coleford and offers the public a tranquil walk through its woodland, which has played host to many film and TV producers. Scenes have been shot there from Harry Potter, The deathly hallows. StarWars, The Force Awakens and BBC’s Merlin to name a few.

Nature booms and is proliferant in the Forest of Dean. Bluebells and daffodils dapple the woodlands floor with purple and yellow. It’s majestical, mythical, ancient woodland has historical intrigue and walking through it can be likened to stepping into a more spiritual and basic time period. But, behind this façade of tourism attractions, its natural exterior and exquisite views The Forest of Dean has a more sinister and ever growing internal problem. Lurking in the forest there are beasts, so if you go down to the woods today, be sure to take an AK47 and plenty of bullets. 

‘War on Boar’, cries the local media. Its plastered on every news board, outside supermarkets and convenience shops in The Forest of Dean. The boar have tormented the public, and have had them fearing for their safety, so lets consider why? 

After investigating some of the history surrounding this problem, I unearthed some terrifying newspaper stories. ‘Hozilla’, one particular boar was named by local newspapers. Hogzilla is a giant, genetic freak that will crush you with one hoof. He’s the size of a small bear and will tear you apart with one tusk. Hogzilla is a North American boar that does not dwell in our country, but somehow found itself being googled, copied, pasted and put on the front cover of local newspapers. Fear and pandemonium spread through the ‘foresters’, they are unsure of when this ‘war’ will be over. 

The ‘war’ is a battle. It’s a battle between hog and man. Newspapers reveal that these boars have women and children trapped inside their cars out of sheer unprovoked terror. Picture the scene; a boar lingers outside their car holding them captive. He circles their car filing his tusks ready for an attack. His victims sit motionless as the boar’s red and evil eyes reflect the violent mood he is in. 

Picture the scene - women and children trapped in their cars out of sheer unprovoked terror.

This is a familiar story between locals; they cannot fathom why these boars have such hatred and resort to merciless tactics. This incident leads us to another terrible act committed by a boar, on a poor and unsuspecting couple and their dog. They were enjoying a walk through the forest, sunlight beamed down on them through the trees and out of nowhere a boar ‘charged at 30mph’, proceeded to ‘jump a 6ft high fence’ and then finally ‘savaged’ their beloved pet. Apparently the boar would not listen to reason and had to be ‘beaten with a branch’ to fend it off. The wild boar eventually admitted defeat and the couple escaped. The wild boars are not only monstrous in size but can now perform extraordinary feats of agility, beyond their capabilities. 

It has also been reported that wild boar have been known to sneak out of the undergrowth, and venture into open spaces. According to newspapers they ‘totally ruin picnics’. Innocent sandwich eaters are resorted to abandoning their lunch and are forced to ‘scramble up trees’. Boars mockingly taunt them while scoffing the remainders of carefully cut salmon and cream cheese sandwiches. Eventually the boar will wander off in search of other happy, unsuspecting picnic goers. 
Many locals have also complained of being ‘prisoners in their own homes’, these headlines suggest that these people fear leaving their houses in case a boar might appear, and then prevent them from re-entering. The boar could whip past them, charge through the door, lock it and then adapt an animal farm type strategy and start living in their homes. They could start wearing their clothes, smoke pipes in the living room and eat all of their carefully labelled preserves. 

‘Unprovoked and frenzied attacks’ another local newspaper claims, as they try to describe the boars behaviour. A frenzied attack conjures up images of a wildly excited beast, hyperactively, fraught and feverish lunging towards an innocent person, crazed in a fast and furious attack. They are mad and leap from one direction to another before choosing to strike. 

So, a mass cull is necessary, according to the local Council. It will provide a solution for these frenzied attacks. A cull will also provide a resolution for landowners and council officials that claim that the boar are a ‘nuisance’ and create ‘damage’. 

In another news story it was reported that one boar in particular had decided to ‘raid’ a local town in The Forest of Dean. The boar had ‘ran amok in the town centre’. In actual fact the boar had churned up a small piece of grass outside a chip shop, but ‘ran amok’ sounds more dramatic. He danced in the street, he sprayed his name in graffiti all over the walls, raided veg shops for sustenance and partied hard before returning to his dark and cold domain. 

Their ‘diggings’ are also well documented. ‘Diggings’, are a name given to the boar’s natural occupation by the media. They don’t use little spades attached to their backs, but instead snuffle up the ground with their snouts. The increase of roadside carnage has proved the council’s suspicions that the boar ‘numbers are out of control’. The diggings are obviously not due to the Forestry Commissions hunters driving them out of the forest, which is their natural habitat and into other areas. It is due to them ‘breeding like rats’. 

The newspapers then tell foresters that ‘soon there will be nothing left’. ‘Football pitches, cricket pitches, parks and picnic sites will all be destroyed’, locals will have to resort to more primitive or singular hobbies inside. The boars have become relentless in their quest for total boar domination. Some locals have now made it their hobby to document diggings and report them hastily to the local council, I’m sure that this new hobby can be a fun activity for all who participate, just be careful if the diggings are fresh. 

Many boar conspiracy theorists believe that the boar want to eradicate all other animals from the forest, destroying habitats in their quake. The council back up these theories with information concerning the possible extinction of butterflies cause by boar. They also confirm suspicions that the boars are eating all the frogs, snakes and lizards in the area. Could it be that all reptilian life will soon be extinct in The Forest of Dean? 

One man has taken the initiative against this boar on terror. Interviewed by the Daily Mail and armed with his '.308 Blazer Hunting Rifle’, he takes to the forest prepared. He admits that when approached by a boar he ‘thrusts himself in a jutting motion’ and proceeds to ‘slice open its upper thigh’. 

Locals are advised to be extremely cautious of boar in the forest, but in reflection of this mans interview I would be inclined to be more mindful of the man jutting around the forest with a high powered gun.
The boar are primarily more active at night, they are nocturnal creatures because their eyesight is poor. They have excellent hearing and are shy to approach. They can be instinctively protective of their young and have been known to be protective of their piglets when threatened, but usually retreat to safety. 

The media, Council and Forestry Commission have successfully made most of the community in The Forest of Dean scared and vengeful. The public’s vengeance makes it easier for the Forestry Commission to carry out their ambitions. 

The Commission want to cull a certain amount of boar each year so they and sell the meat and make huge amounts of profit. Visit to see photographs taken by other members of the public that have a different view of boar. They capture the essence of the boar in wonderful pictures surrounded by nature, their own habitat. 

by Harriet Stenner, University of South Wales

Sunday, 27 March 2016


Centre pages of The Wye Valley & Forest of Dean Review 26th February 2016

The presence of wild boar in the Forest of Dean has become one of the chief issues in the Forest with regular reports of problems caused by the animals.  Here, David Slater of Friends of the Boar group argues they are a benefit to the environment and the annual cull is counter-productive. 

“Wild boar are on the rampage through Gloucestershire, so the Council has sent a team to Germany to see how they cope with the menace”.  “Boar rampage through Coleford.” “Boar attacks man for the first time in 300 years!”

These are some of the headlines in the national and local press back in 2008-9.  Nothing changes it seems. But a recent report paid for by the Forestry Commission concludes that headlines like these have been largely responsible for much of the fear in the minds of residents here in our forest.

“I’m scared to leave my house, a prisoner in my own home”, claimed one resident.  And it is often the older residents who are scared because they are the least likely people to see a boar, and now they’re unwilling to go and enjoy Nature’s wonders on their doorstep.  Such fear-mongering can cause real yet unnecessary distress.

Dutch scientists published a recent report on the public’s perception of wild boar and wolves – two species on their border and heading their way.  Comparing the results with those from people who had seen boar and wolves, it was clear that fear of the boar and wolf dramatically lessened once seen; or “truth will out”.

The Forestry Commission’s recent report, “Social Aspects of Wild Boar”, authored by Dutton, Clayton and Evans at the University of Worcester (2015), differs from the Dutch study because more people have seen a wild boar here than the Dutch people.

Back in 2009-10 hardly a soul had seen a boar here, and the press was creating a false fear. Do you remember the Review’s front page image of Hogzilla, the American giant hog as big as a pony?  And remember the worry that, “It’s only a matter of time before a child gets killed”, in the Forester?  And then came the headline in 2010, “Warning after Wild Boar savages greyhound”.

Loaded language and fear was everywhere until it slowly got through, thanks to Friends of the Boar, that our boar are pure boar, puny compared to the hybridised hogs of America.  People began to research that wild boar only attack people who are causing them harm or distress, and the same goes for dogs too, like the greyhound.  Boar in Europe are the same as ours, including at times, a tameness.

We don’t hear about fear now.  We have anger.  Residents have been put through the mill by the press and the Forestry Commission, unfairly targeted to fear for our safety, then our dogs, and now we have to get angry at the mess and “out of control” breeding.  We are not encouraged to repair the mess, or the battered fences (eg. The Dilke), nor put things into perspective. 

So let me try.  Maybe, one day, someone will actually get hurt, either hitting a boar in a speeding car, or getting knocked over by a boar.  Are we so risk averse we wish to kill animals because of this?  No. About 70 people a year are killed or seriously hurt by cows in the UK!  60 die from wasps & bees.  1 or 2 get an adder’s bite. But the most dangerous animal is the dog.  Half of children get bitten by a dog, and injuries by dogs are the second most common childhood injury to be seen in A&E.  Boar are safe to all good meaning people and dogs, but accidents may one day occur.

And the mess?  Compared to the devastation left behind by the Forestry Commission’s loggers, boar diggings are nothing.  Metre-deep ruts abound, waterlogged and hazardous to walkers.  So much so a lady had to be rescued a couple of years ago after becoming stuck in the Forestry Commission’s mess!  Rutted verges, with logs piled high (and dangerous), have become compacted deserts for plant life.  Driving the roads you won’t see this.  Take a walk!

The Forest of Dean is almost devoid of insects and butterflies, the things that plants need for pollination and birds need for food.  The micro-organisms in the soil struggle with repeated compaction, unable to breathe the air.

How insincere and scientifically flawed were recent comments from Kevin Stannard about the boar threatening the butterflies. Butterflies require flowers on sunny forest rides - something his office destroys.  And species like the small-pearl bordered fritillary requires young bracken, not the huge overgrowths we get thanks to his management.

The wild boar rotivate the forest floor and its sunny grass margins (tracks and roadsides).  Uncompacting the terrible damage caused by the logging, they allow air into the soil as every good gardener and farmer knows.  The boars are Nature’s ploughs.  They’re seed-banks too, caught in the fur as they forage around the forest. They disperse as well as churn up deeply buried seeds giving the flora a chance. 

The wild boar not only reverse the ecological disaster created by the Forestry operations, but they also reverse the damaging impact that free roaming sheep and deer cause.  Sheep and deer are both introduced, non-native species to the Forest (unlike the boar that are native).  They also cause compaction of the soil, but worst of all they nibble away at any soft shoots of grass and flowers that dare raise themselves through the sterile soil, all caused by man and his non-native stock of meat.  Bracken and bramble are the few tough plants to survive this.

Contrast this to the boar.  They dig the soil and crush the bracken, an invasive and carcinogenic plant that swamps out light and out-competes the more delicate flora.  The bracken slowly regroups, allowing the small pearl-bordered fritillary a chance of survival in the shorter shoots, contrary to Mr. Stannard’s belief.

Friends of the Boar, and other wildlife fans have been trying to get this message across for years, about the ecological benefits of boar.  George Monbiot, a journalist and ecologist, as well as Dr. George Peterken (also a local resident), a respected ecologist, both support the ecological necessity of the boar.  Dr. Peterken, whose books you may find for sale in local bookshops, stresses the benefits to the flora.  Mr. Monbiot is an outspoken critic of sheep in our woodlands and uplands, blaming the “white curse” on recent flooding events.  Yes, sheep and deer strip the uplands and forests of vegetation, compacting the soil, and thus destroying the natural ability to store rain and slow down the runoff into rivers and towns. Monbiot argues for the return of boar.

I’ve visited many people in the Forest who are anti-boar. From people who have had their gardens damaged, to those angered over amenity spaces, such as in Ruardean and Joys Green.  Not only have Friends of the Boar helped repair gardens of people in genuine need of help, I often put back overturned sods when out walking, pondering with some frustration why we can’t all do this!  Freshly dug turf is so easy to kick back with a swish of the foot. 

I even went on the local news to demonstrate this after the boar “rampaged” into my home town of Coleford one night, “devastating” an elderly man’s lawn.  Except that it wasn’t a lawn but a roadside, and it was a small lone boar that calmly walked into town, shallowly digging an area no bigger than a kitchen.  Ah, the press!

Each time I drive through Parkend in the winter and see, with some regularity, the roadside diggings. I pray that one-day some of the residents will just “push” the turves back into place, restoring their village and taking pride in its appearance.  I find it therapeutic like a jigsaw puzzle.  But in 5 years of hoping, I’m still waiting (apologies to anyone of has, please keep it up).  And yes, the boar often return and dig it all up again.  But keep on having pride in your village, the boar will leave after 2-3 days, and who knows, those grass verges may see red poppies and yellow hawkbit return, and then the butterflies and bees, as they have across many roadsides in the Forest.

A few people who hate the boar have physically threatened me.  I don’t know why, but just because someone wants to see the boar here doesn’t mean they were responsible for their re-introduction!  In fact, the re-introduction of the boar remains a mystery.  The main theory is that a boar farmer in Abergavenny had had enough, and knowing the area around Staunton decided one night to dispatch a few in a large roadside lay-by.

Initial reports were of a dozen or so released in November of 2004.  This number had expanded by 2006 to be 25-30, by which time the boar had spread deeper into the forest.  No one but keen naturalists and forest rangers saw them.  I remember seeing the photographs (of local naturalist Chris Ridler) of these boars at a local Wldlife Trust evening in 2005.  But in 2006, the Commission’s wildlife ranger Neil Sollis was interviewed for a magazine, in which he stated, “We’ve no idea where the two groups of boar in Dean, about 60 all told, are from, although we do know that they’re pure wild boar."  He continues to say they are almost all juveniles.

So we now learnt that 2 groups of boar existed, each numbering about 30.  The journalist (Angus Watson – Google it!) continues, "They cast a wary eye over us humans, then it’s snouts down to gobble the feed that Neil laid down earlier".

This is interesting, because not only do we have 2 boar sounders (?) joining forces in 2006, they were tame enough for the Forestry Commission to be able to feed them and watch them at close quarters.  Film crews soon followed, literally paying homage to the Forestry Commission’s well-fed boar.

The origin of this other group of boar had remained largely a secret.  They originated from Chase and Penyard hills near Ross-on-Wye, after escaping a local farm about 1999.  They survived in this tiny patch of woodland for 5 years, un-noticed.  In 2006 they had met up with the boar from Staunton, and despite a few encounters with tourists and a farmer’s high-seat at Symonds Yat, remained elusive until about 2007.  In 2009, the Commission put the totals population at 90, a figure adopted by the Council.  From 60 to 90 in 5 years!  Who says boar are prolific breeders?  Only when shot they are, which began in 2008!

It just so happens that between 1999 and March 2004, the thoughts of re-introducing boar into a UK Forest was developing, and DEFRA wanted to know how easy it would be to re-capture them if it turned out to be a disaster.  They paid the Forestry Commission to manage a project at Chase and Penyard, where cages were laid to trap the boar.  It was followed more intensively throughout 2004 in a separate project, resulting in 59 boar overall being trapped in cages; 31 in the first project and 28 in the second.  The trapped boars were nearly all juveniles and seemingly use to being fed and baited by the Forestry Commission under Rob Guest.

In 2011, Kevin Stannard suddenly proclaimed in his management strategy plan (2011-2016) that 60 boar were released at Staunton.  This has gone unquestioned ever since. 

Also in 2011, Stannard was making noises to increase the viable population of boar from 90 (set in 2009) to 400.  He was claiming about 800-1,000 boar existed in the Forest in 2011, based upon thermal imaging surveys in 2010 and 2011 (when 16 and 34 boar were seen respectively).  This census and its methodology is legend as much as it is flawed.  It continues and is called distance-sampling.  I don’t wish to “boar” you with the dry details of why this method is just about the worst available, but do please visit for the details.

In short, the boar population that we read about is massively inflated.  Our Forest simply cannot sustain even 400 boar let alone 1,000.  Boars are limited by density of numbers, which really means limited by available food and most critically shelter – shelter we see continually disturbed and harvested for timber.  Studies over decades conclusively show that densities of 3-4 boar per square kilometre are what is sustainable in the UK.  That means, with our wooded area of 70-80 square kilometres, 200-350 boar will exist peacefully.

When piglets are born, almost always 6 to a litter, once a year only, the population suddenly inflates, albeit on tiny trotters, and density increases.  Many die naturally, but as the survivors greet the summer warmth, the pressure for some boar to move out increases to recover the density to 3-4.  The exodus occurs each Autumn-Winter.

Extra feeding, as done excessively by the Forestry Commission for 12 years, inflates this number leading to more boar “invading” farmland and villages. Also, the mismanagement of the cull can inflate numbers.  When piglets are shot, a sow (maybe even unrelated to mum) will come into season immediately, thereby producing more piglets that year.  Such mismanagement is akin to farming the boar.  Piglets have always made up 75% of the cull each year, as detailed in the larder reports I’ve obtained.  As piglets are shot, more are produced, making a mockery of the claim that cull totals somehow relate to population.  They do not.  Piglets make great barbeques, and the Forestry Commission sells these direct to the customer.  Older boars are sold to a game dealer in Hereford.

These facts and others are never disclosed by the Commission.  The lack of information, misinformation and even disinformation is a huge criticism of the Commission in its own recent study!

What I suggest is that the boar should be left alone in the forest so their density and social structure remain healthy.  Mr. Stannard needs to balance his books another way.  Each year the excess boar leave the forest, often using the same exit points.  High seats should be set up by landowners who may charge hunters to use them.  The hunters take the boar, making sure none are scared back into the forest.  Profits from the meat sales should go into a social fund to compensate genuine victims of boar damage.  All of this negates the need to accurately know the population and how many boar are being poached etc.  The boars will limit themselves naturally to between 200 and 350, and as we all know in the summer months (when the population is at a maximum), often hide away unnoticed in the forest.  That is, until the cull resumes in the Autumn.

Hunting in the forest is a disaster and lessons should be learnt from Germany – do not hunt boar in woodland!  They come into town during the cull, all stressed, possibly agitated enough to attack dogs (often used to hunt boar both in Germany and here).  A recent incident of a boar goring a dog at Lydney Park Hunting Estate is one such example of a boar becoming fearful of hunting dogs like Spaniels.

From what I have now exposed, you decide where the boar came from and why, how many should exist in peace, who is feeding them, is there any mismanagement, how should they be managed, and can we all clean up the mess!

Thursday, 21 January 2016


The results of an unpublished survey, commissioned by the Forestry Commission themselves, has been released on the social aspects of wild boar in the Forest of Dean.

The authors of the Commission's survey, Dutton, Clayton and Evans represent the Institute of Science and the Environment , University of Worcester.

The report does not say anything about the author's credentials, but we do know that Clayton, whilst undertaking her PhD at Worcester, was employed by the Forestry Commission at Bank House for a number of years.

Therefore, before considering this report, we must recognise that it is biased, having been undertaken and paid for by the Forestry Commission and it's employees.

You can download the report at this link:  Social Aspects of Wild Boar in the Forest of Dean 2015

The report is ostensibly about the results of a social survey allowing residents of the Forest of Dean to answer questions and give their opinions and experiences of what it is like to live alongside wild boar.

Given that the authors failed to challenge or clarify the opinions given, both negative and positive results should be taken with a pinch of salt.  People lie!  People get things wrong!

We shall return later to these opinions, but lets start with the history given in the report to check on the accuracy of what IS known.


The first chapter (5 pages) covers the background to the boar in the Forest of Dean.  It correctly states that wild boar have been roaming at Chase and Penyard Hills since 1999 (about 1 mile from the Forest of Dean).  It then makes some interesting comments, that although in themselves are unsurprising, it is what is omitted that highlights a few secrets the Commission do not want you to know.

Page 2.  Chapter 1, section 3:

"Further animals were illegally dumped at Staunton in November 2004 (Figure 1.1). This was reported as 40 animals by Defra (2008) but actually involved 60 individuals.

Initially these two populations were made up of relatively tame animals; there are numerous tales of people hand feeding the boar. It has been reported anecdotally that on at least one occasion the boar were rounded-up with an opportunity for their capture."

The authors are very sure that the number of boar released was not 40 but 60!  No proof given.

The story of how many boar were released near Staunton in November 2004 seems to have morphed over the years.  Very early press reports put the figure at 10-12 boar.  This soon became raised to 25-30 boar (Wilson, Wildl. Biol. Pract., 2014 March 10(3): 1-6), but in the Forestry Commission's own Management Plan of 2011, this inexplicably (and without evidence) became 60 boar.

How do the Forestry Commission know it was 60????????  Maybe it was they whom released the boar?

Let's ask a wildlife ranger, Neil Sollis, who in 2006 was interviewed by freelance journalist Angus Watson.
In this article, Neil Sollis talks of the two groups of boar, "We’ve no idea where the two groups of boar in Dean, about 60 all told, are from, although we do know that they’re pure wild boar."

So, 60 boar were NOT released at Staunton after all.  This is the estimate in 2006 for all the boar from both groups.

So how many escaped from the boar farm at Ross-on-Wye?  We are finding it difficult to find this out, but someone must know - the farmer probably?  Any other clues?  OH YES.

The strange comment above, in our Dutton report that anecdotally, people were feeding and  trying to capture the boar initially, is tremendously insightful to us.

Friends of the Boar have known for many years that two large projects were undertaken on the Ross-on-Wye Boar between 1999 and May 2005.

The study from 1999 - March 2004 included feeding and trapping of boar in Kent, Dorset and Ross-on-Wye.  The 1st May 2004 - 30th April 2005 study consisted of feeding and trapping boar in only Ross-on-Wye.  The Forestry Commission at Bank House in Coleford were employed to undertake this trapping experiment.

In the article cited above, written about Neil Sollis in 2006, we read about the 60 boar, "They cast a wary eye over us humans, then it’s snouts down to gobble the feed that Neil laid down earlier". 

And now you will discover that the 2 Defra projects used HUGE amounts of maize to trap the boar over 5 years!

So NO, it is not anecdotal that people were feeding these early introductions of boar - DEFRA and The Forestry Commission were feeding them copious volumes of food!!!!!

Which, incidentally, they still do.  It is not the public feeding the boar but the Forestry Commission's hunters!

And what of the trapped boar, how many, and what were the ages of the trappees?

Of the earlier study, "In total 31 wild boar (18 males and 13 females) were trapped and tagged, a further 13 animals (some probably recaptures) were trapped and released without fitting tags. Of the 31 animals which were anaesthetised, all appeared to be in good condition and 27 (87%) of the animals were juveniles (6-12 months old). The other 13% (n = 4) were three older females and one male in his second year (Figure 2). The largest trapped animal was 92kg compared to a range of 40-52 kg for the 27 juvenile animals. No fully adult males were trapped".

Of the later study at Ross-on-Wye, "Over the entire study, a total of 28 captures were achieved, composed of 20 individuals and 8 recaptures. The overall trapping rate was 7.3 trap-nights per capture. During Summer 2004 and Spring 2005, 40% and 58% of the estimated minimum population were captured respectively.  Trapping preferentially captured young animals in the population. In Summer, juveniles represented 100% of the captured population but only 75% of the estimated minimum population. In Spring, juveniles comprised 86% of captured animals but only 67-73% of the estimated minimum population". 

Anyone good at maths?   31 + 28 = 59.   Mostly juveniles!  And guess the age range of the boar seen around Staunton JUST AS THESE PROJECTS WERE FOLDING UP around November 2004?  Yep, Juveniles.

Please send this information to your favourite newspaper!

The report has yet another deception in its early Chapter too.

Page 4: "Frantz et al. (2012) found that boar from the Forest of Dean differed genetically from both continental wild individuals and domestic pigs, indicating that this population had a mixed wild boar/domestic pig ancestry".

Although Frantz et al (co-author Massey works for Central Science Labs, part of the Forestry Commission quango) does indeed find domestic pig ancestry in 20 sampled wild boar from the Forest, he also shows how every single boar across Europe also carries the same ancestry!

The paper highlights that although the Forest of Dean boar have some unique markers that set themselves apart from boar on the continent, the differences are insignificant and far removed from the genetics of domestic pigs.  The Forest of Dean boar, as concluded by ranger Neil Sollis and other experts, are as pure a wild boar as those across Europe are.

The rest of the information in the report, therefore, CANNOT BE TRUSTED simply because the authors can't even get the historical facts correct, and they use purposefully misleading language.

But this is what you would expect of a report funded by the Forestry Commission about wild boar.

We get unproven comments about costs of hunting from personal communications between Clayton and Stannard - presumably over their lunch break cuppa.  Similarly, we get inaccurate costs of boar damage, including high costs to repair fences that were not even damaged by boar.

The authors note that many of the respondents say they know about boar, only to contradict themselves elsewhere in the questionnaire.

Respondents claiming boar attacks are obviously mistaken over what a boar attack is.  A boar can easily outrun a human.  If a boar runs at you to attack, it will get you!   So no.  Most "attacks" are of inquisitive boar trotting towards a dog or human for a closer look.  Most people misinterpret this as an charge!  Some attacks are mock attacks, but these are minor incidents, usually when piglets are near mothers.

This is not helped by Dutton et al quoting a spurious report of  Mayer, J.J. (2013). Wild pig attacks on humans. Proceedings of the 15th Wildlife Damage Conference: 17-35.

In this report, Mayer claims 665 attacks have been made by wild boar on humans across the world.  But Mayer defines attack as a "perceived threat" y the human, or as a "close encounter".  Mayer gives no examples of any human actually being attacked in what would be the colloquial meaning of the word!

Using Mayer is to scare the reader into believing wild boar actually attack people, when in fact they do not.  This is clear propaganda and scaremongering by the Forestry Commission who paid for this report.

But remarkably, given the biased nature of the report, what we discover in it's conclusion is a heavy criticism of the Forestry Commission.

The local press is also, quite accurately, held responsible for lying and fear mongering and sensationalising the boar, much to the detriment of some local residents who live in fear thanks to the rubbish that some journalists concoct and the loaded language they like to use (rampage, beast, savage, hairy, tusked, invade..)

Here is the summary:

9.0 Summary Comments
There are, without doubt, significant impacts on the residents of the Forest of Dean by the presence and activity of wild boar. However, the significance of these varies widely, and can be both negative and positive.

Perhaps the main issue identified by this project is the lack of satisfaction with the provision of information on wild boar. This is highlighted by the results of the questionnaire but also came across strongly when the project team spoke to residents, business proprietors, etc. There was extreme dissatisfaction with the Forestry Commission and District Council with what was felt to be poor and/or a lack of communication that exacerbates the frustration experienced by the negative impacts of boar. It is also unclear to many why the District Council abdicates any responsibility for providing information and the management of boar and passes all enquiries, etc., to the Forestry Commission. This reflects the situation recorded in the Netherlands.

Dissatisfaction is increased with what is perceived as misinformation and disinformation. Much of this maybe more as a result of what is seen as a lack of provision of information. However, incidents such as the misrepresentation of the minimum numbers calculated by thermal imaging as actual numbers is unhelpful.

Local media, especially the local newspapers, are also culpable in perpetuating some of the issues, such as anxiety and fear, with sensationalistic reports that frequently contradict one another. Mayer (2013) also reported that the media were quick to highlight the attacks and the threat of attacks; the English media were mentioned in particular to be sensationalistic. Clayton & Dutton (in prep) reviewed media articles in 2010 and found both national and local media were sensationalistic, with few reports being neutral in nature.

Greater awareness and more accurate, clear and detailed information on the risks and benefits would be invaluable in managing the expectations, fears and issues of residents. Better information and education on adapting behaviour, expectations of individual responsibility, etc., would allow many to overcome any concerns regarding the presence of boar.

It is not the remit of this report to comment on the management of wild boar in the Forest of Dean. However, the lessons from Baden-Württemberg and other European countries would indicate that tough decisions are required to ensure the boar within the area do not become more of an issue to resident communities (and visitors). In particular in respect to negative boar-people incidents, boar-vehicle collisions, impacts on amenity areas, etc., although other negative impacts should not be discarded as unimportant.

A sustainable (in financial/resource terms) population management strategy that is acceptable to residents and external stakeholders and communicated would seem to be an essential requirement for the management of boar and the expectations of resident communities. However, as can be seen from the crude calculations from data provided by the Forestry Commission, currently the financial costs of wild boar management seriously outweigh any economic benefits.